Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 10 - Jul 15
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
10 Yosemite Stamps Unused Landscape Painting Nature Scene // Yosemite Valley Vintage Postage Stamps for Mailing10 Unused Yosemite Stamps Landscape Painting Nature Scene Yosemite Valley Vintage Wilderness Postage Stamps for MailingFace Value: 42 CentsYear of Issue: 2008Scott No: 4346Year Painting Completed: 1864Your order Includes 10 (ten) 42 California Landscape Stamps. These breathtaking landscape stamps are perfectly suitable for use as postage, as long as you use additional stamps to add up to the current postage rate. These beautiful vintage mountain
10 Unused Yosemite Stamps // Landscape Painting Nature Scene // Yosemite Valley Vintage Wilderness Postage Stamps for MailingFace Value: 42 Cents
Year of Issue: 2008
Scott No: 4346
Year Painting Completed: 1864
Your order Includes 10 (ten) 42¢ California Landscape Stamps.
These breathtaking landscape stamps are perfectly suitable for use as postage, as long as you use additional stamps to add up to the current postage rate. These beautiful vintage mountain valley stamps will add an epic personalized touch to your wedding invitations, save the dates, or greeting cards.
Regards,
Patrick
p.s. The Backstory: Valley of the Yosemite is a painting by Albert Bierstadt he completed in 1864. Initially associated with the Hudson River School, Bierstadt rose to prominence for his paintings of the Rocky Mountains, which established him as one of the best painters of the western American landscape. This painting now hangs at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1482 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good top!!
Size: X-Large, Color: White
True to size! Feels good and is comfortable. Recommended to others!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable and convenient
Size: 34, Color: Kangaroo
Got these to replace some old cargo shorts that aren't made anymore and are developing holes. So far I have been very pleased. The waist fits true to size and the fit is relaxed through the seat and thigh, which is exactly what I was looking for since I have somewhat stout thighs relative to my waist. I'm 6'0", about 200lbs, with a 34-35" waist. The material feels sturdy without being overly heavy, about as thick as old ripstop BDUs.
Front slash pockets are generously deep; no problem carrying a 5.5" smartphone in there. Rear pockets are sufficiently deep and are narrow enough that a trifold wallet won't turn itself sideways. Cargo pockets are adequately sized and have hook and loop closures at the corners. The "tech" pocket behind the left cargo pocket is very convenient for me, as I'm used to carrying my phone on that side. I can slide my Samsung Galaxy S25 in there and it fits well without worrying about it falling out.
I wore these for a couple of days at Disney World last week and they performed very well. Moving my phone to that tech pocket made rides with lap bars or belts much more comfortable. I even washed these shorts at the resort so I could wear them on the long drive home.
If I could change anything about them, I'd add about an inch of length, as I prefer a full 11" inseam on cargo shorts. And maybe add a button or some kind of closure to the rear pockets. But aside from that, these have been pretty close to perfect. I expect I'll order more as I replace more of my older cargo shorts.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great Shorts
Size: 38, Color: Grain Twill
Ok.... I have bought these several times, the shorts aren't wearing out or tearing, I am losing weight,.... I like these shorts so much, I keep buying them in my new size... Every size (44 42 40 and 38) has fit well, good length, and are comfortable... Pockets are functional, left side fits my smart phone... Yes, I will buy them again....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Lightweight and comfortable
Size: 42, Color: Kangaroo, Size: 42, Color: Kangaroo
The fit is just right and they're very comfortable. This is the second pair I've bought and the review could easily be for both pairs. The only difference between them is the color.
I deducted a star because they really need at least 2 more belt loops. Why do manufacturers skimp on something that would be so inexpensive to do right? The belt loops on either side of the front button are 11 inches apart. Ideally they'd be at most 5 or 6 inches apart.
Anyway, these will be the shorts I wear to do my yard work. I can put my phone in the right hand cargo pocket and know that the Velcro closure won't let it fall out while I'm working. My keys will go in the left side cargo pocket.
I'd definitely buy them again. The price is right and they are comfortable to wear.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Very well designed shorts!
Size: 36, Color: Gunmetal
Bought one pair awhile ago, and now buying several more. Great relaxed fit, very comfortable, good fabric weight AND pockets not designed by morons - actually so easy to store and retrieve wallet and phone unlike Dockers and Izod and other cargo shorts I've purchased in the past. So comfortable and well designed. They're cut a little large for the stated size - but not necessarily a bad thing, and waist has a little bit of stretch. Love them!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2026