Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 13 - Jul 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Waveshare 2pcs USB To LoRa Data Transfer Module Based On SX1262, LF Version Using TCXO Crystal Oscillator, HF Version Using TCXO Crystal Oscillator, LF Version Using XTAL Crystal Oscillator, HF Version Using XTAL Crystal Oscillator1. This product is a wireless data transmission terminal based on the USB interface of the SX1262 solution. Using LoRa modulation and demodulation technology, it has the characteristics of strong anti interference and long distance communication, and the communication distance can reach 5KM. It supports point to point, point to multiple, relay networking, AES encryption and other communication methods. It is small in size and easy to install. It is
1. This product is a wireless data transmission terminal based on the USB interface of the SX1262 solution. Using LoRa modulation and demodulation technology, it has the characteristics of strong anti-interference and long-distance communication, and the communication distance can reach 5KM. It supports point-to-point, point-to-multiple, relay networking, AES encryption and other communication methods. It is small in size and easy to install. It is suitable for standard or non-standard user protocol wireless data transmission and equipment control of industrial control.
2. Use SX1262 solution, with -148dBm receiving sensitivity and 22dBm transmitting power
3. Support preamble detection, with CRC, automatic subpacket, 960 byte cache function
4. Support LBT transmission, RSSI output, AT command set setting
5. Support AES encrypted communication to ensure the security of data transmission
6. Support multi-level relay networking to increase the distance of wireless communication
7. Support PC configuration and firmware upgrade
8. Provide a complete supporting manual
Shape parameters:
-Interface type: USB Type A
-SMA-KE female socket: 6dBi omnidirectional antenna × 1
-Shell: ABS shell
- Dimensions: 56.40 × 18.40 × 12.52mm
Wireless parameters:
- Frequency band: Sub-GHz (410~510MHz, 850~930MHz)
- Signal modulation: LoRa
-Encryption type: AES128
- Transmitting power: +22dBm Max
-Receiving sensitivity: -148dBm
Serial parameters:
- Baud rate: 1200 ~ 115200bps
- Parity bit: none, odd parity, even parity
-Data bits: 8 ~ 9 bits
- flow control: N/A
Environmental requirements:
- Operating temperature: TCXO version 0 ~ 85 degrees Celsius, XTAL version: 0 ~ 50 degrees Celsius
- Humidity range: 5% ~ 95% relative humidity
Specification:
| Package Weight |
|
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 129 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Good sun protection without chemicals, without a high price.
Style: 4 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I've bought this a couple of times. I feel like it gives excellent sun protection at a reasonable price. I mostly use it on my face. When I first apply it, it looks a little white and pasty, but it doesn't take long for that to go away. It's a little greasy at first , but I have dry skin, so I it absorbs in. I like using a sunscreen that doesn't have a lot of chemicals. This works well while using ingredients I feel good about putting on my skin.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 13, 2025
★★★★★ 5
A very effective sunscreen at a very reasonable price
Style: 4 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
This sunscreen is very reasonably priced but would I love about this product more than anything is how effective it is at protecting your skin and will be my first go to when purchasing a sunscreen, and for a man, it is best to be clean shaven when using, and not to put on too much as it will make you look like Casper the ghost if you do
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
No scent and blends in surprisingly well.
Style: 4 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Eucerin 50 (Sensitive Mineral - Zinc Oxide)
Expiration date: Sept. 2026
Purchase date: May 2025
The most noticeable ingredients in the sunscreen are zinc oxide, mineral oil, and a yellow tint. The sunscreen is not scented which is always a plus. The yellow tint was not noticeable on my deep bronze skin. My skin is sensitive to many chemical products but not this one. The product blended in well into my skin both when dry and when using a moisturizing toner. There was not a white cast after giving it a few minutes to be absorbed by the skin. Most oil-based sunscreens leave my skin feeling greasy when perspiring but the Eucerin 50 was a pleasant surprise. The perspiration felt normal and not greasy.
Overall, I am very pleased with the product. It is great for active people who normally sweat away sunscreen. Eucerin 50 left my skin feeling very soft after washing it off. This is the first mineral oil-based sunscreen that I have found to be satisfactory. I believe it to be a good value at the twenty-dollar or less price range.
Warning!: It can stain your clothing. Do not store oil-based sunscreens in a hot environment like your automobile. The ingredients will separate.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2025
★★★★★ 5
I've tried MANY sunscreens. This is the best for the money you can buy.
Style: 4 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I have a section in my closet reserved for the graves of past sunscreens. And there are A LOT. Reasons why this is the best for price point:
1. No white cast. Maybe 2%. Yes, there is a bad a white cast when you first put it on, especially if your face is still a tad damp from washing. But it almost completely disappears within minutes. And this is coming from someone who is of Southeast Asian descent, and currently have a natural a tan this time of year. I get tan because I don't apply it every 2 hours as recommended. I only use it when I'm working out outside and the sun is blasting my face. I live where it gets very sunny.
2. NOT oily. I have super oily skin and so many of my sunscreens makes my face more of an oil slick than normal. I have matiffying ones, that work well, but it gets expensive.
3. Fragrance free! I prefer to use as many fragrance-free products as possible.
4. DOESN'T STING EYES. I'm surprised at how many "sunscreens for the face" are out there that absolutely sting my eyes into waterworks.
5. Price-point. A giant tube (for the face) for all that? It will take me a very long time to go through it. For my body, I use cheaper fragrance-free mineral sunscreens, or sunscreens I want to get rid of.
6. I use a moderate strength prescription of Tretinoin, and those who know, know that without sun protection, the skin can get burned and irritated extremely easily. Not me! And I use Tretinoin every single night.
I'm so glad Eucerin made this, I hope they never discontinue this!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2022
★★★★★ 1
Awful for normal/combo skin types!
Style: 4 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Terrible for normal/combo skin! I applied sunscreen to my clean, dry face – without moisturizer. After waiting 25 minutes, I checked to see if the product hadn’t absorbed into my skin. It remained on top of my skin in a shiny, slippery, greasy film that rubbed off onto anything it touched. It’s settled thickly into crevices and fine lines, especially in the folds of my eyelids. There was so much shine – not glow – on my skin that it created flashback when I took a picture. Somehow, the sunscreen made my skin appear both oily and dry at the same time! Many other reviewers said that they successfully put make up over this sunscreen, but I cannot imagine how this would be successful, unless the makeup finish was incredibly matte. It’s the worst experience I’ve ever had with any sunscreen!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 4, 2026